Chad Godfirnon
My feedback
24 results found
-
165 votes
Hello, I wanted to let you know that the following development was completed as part of the changes for Expanded Learning Programs and shipped on 6/24/2025.
Here are the relevant revision notes:
New Year Rollover:
- For California districts, data in the following tables will roll over for records with start dates on or after July: Supp Att Calendar (ATC), Supp Att Assignments (ATA), Supp Att Data (ATD).
School Info:
- Configurations > District Settings:
- A new district setting titled “Supplemental Attendance Program Codes for Attendance Recovery” is now available. Users with Edit rights can identify which Supplemental Attendance Program (ATP.TY) codes are used for this program type. See District Settings.
- A new district setting titled “Expanded Learning Programs” is now available. Users with Edit rights can identify which Supplemental Attendance Program (ATP.TY) codes are used for this program type. See District Settings.
Student Data…
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
185 votes
Hello, I wanted to let you know that the following development was completed as part of the changes for Attendance Recovery and shipped on 6/24/2025.
Here are the relevant revision notes:
New Year Rollover:
- For California districts, data in the following tables will roll over for records with start dates on or after July: Supp Att Calendar (ATC), Supp Att Assignments (ATA), Supp Att Data (ATD).
School Info:
- Configurations > District Settings:
- A new district setting titled “Supplemental Attendance Program Codes for Attendance Recovery” is now available. Users with Edit rights can identify which Supplemental Attendance Program (ATP.TY) codes are used for this program type. See District Settings.
- A new district setting titled “Expanded Learning Programs” is now available. Users with Edit rights can identify which Supplemental Attendance Program (ATP.TY) codes are used for this program type. See District Settings.
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
65 votes
7/22/25 Update:
After researching the requirements for the Reading Difficulties Risk Screenings with the relevant CDE staff, we have determined that the best place to store the screener results wil be im the Program Screenings table. Although this was originally developed to use in Texas for similar Dyslexia Screenings, it is available to all our customers. It appears on the Special Programs page as a separate accordian. We will be creating a new fixed code (RDR) to use on that page, and a set of results ranging from Not Screened to whether a risk was found or not as a result of the screening. Development on this will be beginning shortly. Here is the current documentation on Program Screenings: Special Programs - Program Screenings.
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
267 votes
This clarification message was added to the SUN Bucks communcation pieced linked earlier, so we are adding it here to maintain consistency as to our plans:
-----------------
There seems to still be some confusion, so we are clarifying out intended actions, as many comments added to this idea cover a wide variety of requests:
We are planning development during the current quarter to make specific upgrades to allow recording in Aeries which students were designated as Free or Reduced based on the UBA (and not the NSLP Application) via a new Source Code. Also, in the same way that districts can make the NSLP application available for download in the parent portal, a customized UBA could also be uploaded into the Parent Portal so they can access it to fill out.
The actual collecting of the UBA, analyzing the responses, assigning the status to a student, and conducting audits would…
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Chad Godfirnon shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Chad Godfirnon shared this idea ·
-
136 votes
We are gathering additional information on required fields for Online Enrollment. Please complete this quick survey: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=lA6S1E_xdUSP3ST6jbsXbC0Hj7r2Vz5CpB-r0kTsIGpUNVRNREVHSUNMTFpCTzVVRFkzQ1UxRlZMTS4u
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
26 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
29 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
32 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
12 votes
Chad Godfirnon shared this idea ·
-
6 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
48 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
179 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
83 votesConsidered for Feature Modernization ·
AdminTamika Sloan (Senior Business Analyst, Aeries Software) responded
This idea is being planned for the Next Generation of Aeries.
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Chad Godfirnon supported this idea ·
If you match an online enrollment record to an existing Aeries student record, the field discrepancy highlighting is broken when using dark mode. The highlighting does not appear for most fields. Please see attached images.