Alexandra Nims
My feedback
55 results found
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
-
180 votes
Hello, I wanted to let you know that the following development was completed as part of the changes for Attendance Recovery and shipped on 6/24/2025.
Here are the relevant revision notes:
New Year Rollover:
- For California districts, data in the following tables will roll over for records with start dates on or after July: Supp Att Calendar (ATC), Supp Att Assignments (ATA), Supp Att Data (ATD).
School Info:
- Configurations > District Settings:
- A new district setting titled “Supplemental Attendance Program Codes for Attendance Recovery” is now available. Users with Edit rights can identify which Supplemental Attendance Program (ATP.TY) codes are used for this program type. See District Settings.
- A new district setting titled “Expanded Learning Programs” is now available. Users with Edit rights can identify which Supplemental Attendance Program (ATP.TY) codes are used for this program type. See District Settings.
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
262 votes
This clarification message was added to the SUN Bucks communcation pieced linked earlier, so we are adding it here to maintain consistency as to our plans:
-----------------
There seems to still be some confusion, so we are clarifying out intended actions, as many comments added to this idea cover a wide variety of requests:
We are planning development during the current quarter to make specific upgrades to allow recording in Aeries which students were designated as Free or Reduced based on the UBA (and not the NSLP Application) via a new Source Code. Also, in the same way that districts can make the NSLP application available for download in the parent portal, a customized UBA could also be uploaded into the Parent Portal so they can access it to fill out.
The actual collecting of the UBA, analyzing the responses, assigning the status to a student, and conducting audits would…
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Alexandra Nims shared this idea ·
-
18 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
42 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Alexandra Nims shared this idea ·
-
10 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
128 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
109 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
-
11 votesConsidered for Feature Modernization ·
AdminTamika Sloan (Senior Business Analyst, Aeries Software) responded
The "Households" concept that will be introduced with Aeries NextGen should handle this situation. Thank you for submitting the idea!
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
122 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexandra Nims commented
I agree with the comments below, especially with Jennie Ibarra. " there should also be a feasible way to disregard the income responses for a parent if the district has already determined them to be categorically eligible (either by ignoring the income response or not even allowing the parent to submit it if we have already determined the higher benefit through direct certification). This will be a big issue for CEP districts and trying to maintain this information." and Cassandra Lane " We also can't control the entry date, which really should be the students' enrollment dates, not the date the parents completed the income survey."
Having the survey has helped us to determine those families that are income eligible and for our unduplicated counts, however, it has created invalid removal of direct certification data, and duplicate records.
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
132 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
-
90 votes
Alexandra Nims supported this idea ·
Idea for a "canned" report. A next year enrollment report based on a students' next grade & next school. It would include the option to review this at the district level or site level. It would be similar to the "Active Student" Report, but looking at the "next field" it would include both active students and pre-enrolled students.