Alexandra Nims

My feedback

54 results found

  1. 101 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  2. 131 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims shared this idea  · 
  4. 18 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  5. 5 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  7. 42 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims shared this idea  · 
  9. 10 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  10. 127 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  11. 8 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  12. 109 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  13. 13 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  14. 9 votes
    How important is this to you?
  15. 8 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  16. 120 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alexandra Nims commented  · 

    I agree with the comments below, especially with Jennie Ibarra. " there should also be a feasible way to disregard the income responses for a parent if the district has already determined them to be categorically eligible (either by ignoring the income response or not even allowing the parent to submit it if we have already determined the higher benefit through direct certification). This will be a big issue for CEP districts and trying to maintain this information." and Cassandra Lane " We also can't control the entry date, which really should be the students' enrollment dates, not the date the parents completed the income survey."

    Having the survey has helped us to determine those families that are income eligible and for our unduplicated counts, however, it has created invalid removal of direct certification data, and duplicate records.

    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  17. 130 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  18. 89 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  19. 12 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Alexandra Nims supported this idea  · 
  20. 178 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alexandra Nims commented  · 

    The income survey was a very impactful for our school district. However, it is proving to be incompatible in its ability to handle the SPRG for Calpads. I wish the system would be able to manage Direct Cert and income application coming in via Titan (through the NSLP import) and those through the Parent Data Confirmation. I have had to manually go into each student that has a Calpads error due to NSLP duplication or overlapping and delete records. (see attachment)

← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base