Alexandra Nims
My feedback
45 results found
-
5 votes
-
2 votesplanned for Next Gen Aeries ·
AdminTamika Sloan
(Senior Business Analyst, Aeries Software)
responded
The "Households" concept that will be introduced with Aeries NextGen should handle this situation. Thank you for submitting the idea!
Alexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Per the PFT Webinar on January 25th, 2023. According to CDE the LEAs are not required to send the PFT pass/not pass results or "Healthy Fitness Zones" to the parents. They do, however, need to report the raw scores to the students. The CDE said it would be an LEA's local decision to report the PFT scores to the parents. (also see item 6 under PFT Data in the CDE's Physical Fitness FAQ page
https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/pft11fasqa.asp)
The Fitnessgram uses proprietary calculations for the VO2max and the Healthy Fitness Zones. As such, Aeries cannot calculate the pass/not passed statuses for the individual test parts. LEA staff, however, are able to hand enter the pass/not pass test statuses for each student or run mass change queries on the PFT data to set the statuses.
In testing administrations prior to COVID the PFT data would be exported from Aeries and uploaded into the…
Alexandra Nims
shared this idea
·
-
100 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
44 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
75 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
139 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexandra Nims
commented
The income survey was a very impactful for our school district. However, it is proving to be incompatible in its ability to handle the SPRG for Calpads. I wish the system would be able to manage Direct Cert and income application coming in via Titan (through the NSLP import) and those through the Parent Data Confirmation. I have had to manually go into each student that has a Calpads error due to NSLP duplication or overlapping and delete records. (see attachment)
-
32 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAlexandra Nims
shared this idea
·
-
129 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
123 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
145 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAlexandra Nims
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteAlexandra Nims
shared this idea
·
-
18 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
53 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
-
39 votesAlexandra Nims
supported this idea
·
I agree with the comments below, especially with Jennie Ibarra. " there should also be a feasible way to disregard the income responses for a parent if the district has already determined them to be categorically eligible (either by ignoring the income response or not even allowing the parent to submit it if we have already determined the higher benefit through direct certification). This will be a big issue for CEP districts and trying to maintain this information." and Cassandra Lane " We also can't control the entry date, which really should be the students' enrollment dates, not the date the parents completed the income survey."
Having the survey has helped us to determine those families that are income eligible and for our unduplicated counts, however, it has created invalid removal of direct certification data, and duplicate records.