Peter Bugno
My feedback
57 results found
-
75 votes
Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
-
216 votes
This clarification message was added to the SUN Bucks communcation pieced linked earlier, so we are adding it here to maintain consistency as to our plans:
-----------------
There seems to still be some confusion, so we are clarifying out intended actions, as many comments added to this idea cover a wide variety of requests:
We are planning development during the current quarter to make specific upgrades to allow recording in Aeries which students were designated as Free or Reduced based on the UBA (and not the NSLP Application) via a new Source Code. Also, in the same way that districts can make the NSLP application available for download in the parent portal, a customized UBA could also be uploaded into the Parent Portal so they can access it to fill out.
The actual collecting of the UBA, analyzing the responses, assigning the status to a student, and conducting audits would…
Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
-
41 votes
We are tracking info from the CDE on what the changes for Attendance Accounting will be for the various types of instruction covered by AB 176. As soon as we have all the information they intend to collect, and what the draft audit guidelines are, we can begin development on what changes we need to make for the upcoming school year, to be sure our customers can track the information needed for this reporting.
Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Peter Bugno shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Peter Bugno shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peter Bugno commented
I would like to clarify that the Student Name and ID are both combined in column A. You can confirm this by exporting as a TXT file.
Please update this report so that the ID is kept to its own column, and Student Name goes into its own column.
Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
-
68 votes
Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Peter Bugno shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Peter Bugno shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Peter Bugno shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Peter Bugno shared this idea ·
-
22 votes
-
2 votes
Peter Bugno shared this idea ·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peter Bugno commented
Slightly tangential:
There is a very similar issue in the Data Confirmation Status report on the [Income Survey] section and the [Medical] module.If you do not use the [Medical] module then it will always be blank, and ALL students will appear on the incomplete report since nobody filled out the disabled Medical section.
There is a similar issue with the [Income Survey] not properly getting tracked and students appear on the incomplete report. -
1 vote
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peter Bugno commented
I would ask that staff members be added as victims of harassment, etc., and that this request should not be limited to just assault.
(I believe this is part of our CRDC reporting, but we have to store this as a binary flag in a custom field on the assertive discipline record)
Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Peter Bugno shared this idea ·
-
119 votes
An update for this feature has been posted in the Known Issues area:
Insurance Info & Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative (CYBHI)
Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Peter Bugno supported this idea ·
My other idea would be to add an asterisk or comment that "unverified absences will still be updated" even if the "fill-in periods" option is unchecked.
Users should not have to look up online documentation to find a comment that the option does not do what it specifies.
If it says don't fill in periods then don't fill in periods. If you're going to do it anyways then you need to notify users...
Tegrity!