Chris Holloway
My feedback
68 results found
-
2 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
-
2 votes
-
2 votesChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
44 votes
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Holloway
commented
Further, the flowchart algorithm currently includes "has portal access" as a determiner for being included as a reported contact. We have had a case when a grandmother that does not live with the student, but had portal access was included in the SINF as a guardian. We do not believe that simply having been granted portal access should qualify as being a reportable guardian to CALPADS.
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Holloway
commented
Additional thoughts now that CALPADS has switched to the SINF file format with multiple guardian fields.
The education level is required for reported guardians. The reported education level is then used as a factor for determining socio-economic disadvantaged status. When multiple guardians are reported, if one of the guardians have the 15 - Decline status ... then the student will automatically not qualify. However, IF only one guardian is reported then ONLY that guardian's ed level would be required.
The flowchart based algorithm can include unexpected/undesired contacts as part of the reported guardians. This can cause SINF submission errors and worse - possibly incorrect socio-economic status determination.
Chris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
28 votes
-
49 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
-
1 voteChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
6 votes
Hello, I wanted to let you know that development is starting on this item, and it will be shipped when testing is completed.
Chris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Holloway
commented
If this is referring to the list of entered interventions on the right side of the page... Yes, I would also like the page layout changed. I think if it functioned like the assertive discipline page (having a list of prior entries to select... then once one is selected have a dropdown of entries and show the selected incident details) that would be nicer and more consistent.
We have users that don't see the list on the far right (perhaps screen resolution... or maybe just not expecting a list of prior entries to be in that location).
Having the list of selectable records further to the left in the page layout would be more friendly to the user.
** the pre-referral interventions page also has this issue.
This would be great! We typically only grant groups to users and not direct permissions. We currently have to add calendar reminders for ourselves to remove temporary groups from users.