Chris Holloway
My feedback
69 results found
-
6 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 voteChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Holloway
commented
This would be great! We typically only grant groups to users and not direct permissions. We currently have to add calendar reminders for ourselves to remove temporary groups from users.
Chris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
65 votes
-
2 votes
-
2 votesChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Holloway
commented
Further, the flowchart algorithm currently includes "has portal access" as a determiner for being included as a reported contact. We have had a case when a grandmother that does not live with the student, but had portal access was included in the SINF as a guardian. We do not believe that simply having been granted portal access should qualify as being a reportable guardian to CALPADS.
An error occurred while saving the comment Chris Holloway
commented
Additional thoughts now that CALPADS has switched to the SINF file format with multiple guardian fields.
The education level is required for reported guardians. The reported education level is then used as a factor for determining socio-economic disadvantaged status. When multiple guardians are reported, if one of the guardians have the 15 - Decline status ... then the student will automatically not qualify. However, IF only one guardian is reported then ONLY that guardian's ed level would be required.
The flowchart based algorithm can include unexpected/undesired contacts as part of the reported guardians. This can cause SINF submission errors and worse - possibly incorrect socio-economic status determination.
Chris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
30 votes
-
52 votesChris Holloway
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
-
1 voteChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesChris Holloway
shared this idea
·
The Discipline Letters are still pulling the [Disposition] value from ADS.DS which is no longer used.
The Discipline Letter template has a "Disc Text 4" section that includes the various dispositions for the incident.
Having letters generate with blank Disposition descriptions makes the letter confusing to parents.
How can a feature that is part of the core functioning of the application go so long without being addressed?
For reference - Support Ticket: 407926