M. Crawford
My feedback
12 results found
-
249 votes
4/2/26 - Recent updates to Attendance Recovery
Yesterday’s release contained quite a few items related to Attendance Recovery that we wanted to bring to your attention:
- We’ve updated our Workflow AR document to make it clear about new set-up tasks that must be completed in order for the process to function properly.
- A new District Setting for ADA Make-Up has been added and must be defined in order to enable this new functionality.
- A new field (ATT.AMU) has been added to store Attendance Minutes Utilized when ADA Make-Up is applied for Attendance Recovery.
- Minutes will be auto-calculated based on the student's Special Ed Alternate Minimum Day, school type, or grade level, depending on which applies.
- We will be adding a process soon to automatically update the ATT.AMU field for any existing absences previously recovered via AR.
- We’ve added the Attendance Recovery Bank page that provides a read-only view of each…
An error occurred while saving the comment
M. Crawford
supported this idea
·
-
305 votes
We've just shipped the final set-up piece to allow the creation of the SUN Bucks Supplemental Submisison extract. The final piece, the EDCS extract itself, is in development, and will be released as soon it passes final testing..
- Code Translations: Added support for NSLP Source Code (FRE.SRC) mappings in CALPADS Code Translations. Districts can now map local NSLP source codes to EDCS fixed codes. This new mapping will be used for supporting Sunbucks. See Prepping for Supplemental SUN Bucks Collection (SSBC) via EDCS.
-
32 votes
-
174 votes
M. Crawford
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
-
11 votes
M. Crawford
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
M. Crawford
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
M. Crawford
supported this idea
·
-
51 votes
M. Crawford
supported this idea
·
-
142 votes
Unfortunately, we are unable to move forward with this request until CALPADS makes changes in its system to allow SIS Vendors to access the API like the Special Ed Vendors can. While this enhancement is not currently on our roadmap, we appreciate your feedback and will keep it in mind for future consideration.
M. Crawford
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
-
224 votes
M. Crawford
supported this idea
·

Hello Jan. You stated, "We shared with CDE that this distinction is not clearly stated on their current FAQ page, particularly under the tab labeled Attendance Recovery and ELO-P. We requested that they update their documentation to help LEAs navigate these requirements with confidence." Was this to add a new FAQ to the page or were you asking them to update a particular question number? If so, what number was it?